|
My practice is limited to representing clients regarding issues related to
marriage, separation and divorce, including the following:
•
requirements for marriage, including common law marriage
• premarital agreements
• dissolution of marriage (divorce)
• parenting plans (I am currently only accepting cases where primary custody
is disputed in the collaborative dispute resolution model).
• division of property, including all types of retirement accounts, real
estate,
businesses, entities, stocks and other investments
• spousal maintenance (alimony)
• child support and related issues
I
represent clients in the following dispute resolution models:
1.
Collaborative Representation. Collaborative representation
has been gaining popularity as a model for resolving domestic cases throughout
many major cities in the United States and Canada since 1990. In collaborative
law, a specially trained attorney represents each spouse. The role of the
attorneys is to assist the spouses in reaching an agreement that meets the
legitimate needs of both spouses to the maximum degree possible. The attorneys’
efforts are geared toward advising, problem solving, and guiding the parties
through the process. Both spouses and the attorneys enter into a binding
contract that disqualifies both attorneys if either party elects to go to
Court. There is a commitment to resolve any and all disputed issues in good
faith from the beginning to the end of the process.
Many cases involve a neutral financial professional, a child specialist and a
coach as needed. The use of these experts helps to to streamline the process
and meet the needs of each family.
Although not for everyone, this model appeals to many parties who are
dissatisfied with our current court system and recognize the damage to families
that is often caused by traditional legal proceedings. The model allows the
parties to have maximum input into the process and identification of the issues
that need to be resolved.
Please note that
presently there are only a handful of attorneys in El Paso County who are
trained and currently accepting cases in the collaborative model.
2. Mediation.
Mediation is a voluntary dispute resolution process where a trained neutral
facilitator helps spouses negotiate a mutually acceptable resolution that meets
as many of both of their needs as possible. The mediator provides general
information, helps identify issues to be resolved and help parties evaluate and
reach final resolutions. A mediator can’t advocate for either party and does
not have the authority to decide any remaining disputed issues. Parties may
have their attorneys present during the mediation session(s); or they may
participate in the process without attorneys. Mediation is a confidential
process and the information discussed during mediation is not disclosed even to
a judge.
Divorcing spouses in El Paso
County must complete at least one good faith mediation session before they
proceed with a final orders hearing in front of a judge. It’s often helpful to
schedule mediation early in your case before positions become polarized. Even
if an agreement can’t be reached regarding all issues, resolving even some of
the issues will help move your case forward and minimize cost and stress. In El
Paso County, it is common for spouses to be in separate rooms and the mediator
to shuttle back and forth. Although common, this is not a requirement.
There are many mediators in
our community and their experience, knowledge and training vary greatly. It is
critical that you and your spouse select a mediator that has the expertise
necessary to handle your case. Many of the questions for selecting an attorney
listed on the More Information section of this site also apply to the selection
of a mediator.
3. Arbitration.
Arbitration is a process where a neutral party, the Arbiter, is selected by the
parties and counsel to decide any issues that the parties submit for
resolution. In essence, the Arbiter is a “private judge”. The selection and
authority of the Arbiter, the issues to be resolved, and the process to be
followed are defined by a written agreement entered into at the beginning of
the process. In El Paso County, the process is typically less formal than a
Court proceeding and is often combined with mediation. (i.e.
mediation-arbitration). In this process, the neutral facilitator tries to help
the spouses resolve all issues via mediation. If they are unsuccessful, any
remaining issues are decided by the neutral facilitator in his/her role as
Arbiter.
This process of arbitration,
or mediation-arbitration, offers a number of benefits. Like mediation, it is a
private process and can be scheduled on a date and time convenient for the
parties. Spouses, usually with the help of their attorneys, can select the
person who will serve as Arbiter and therefore will know for sure who will
decide the issues in their case if they are unsuccessful. Usually, the Arbiter
is an attorney or retired Judge who has significant experience with family law
cases and the type of issues in the specific case at hand. Parties have an
opportunity to talk directly to the arbiter, rather than through formal
testimony required in Court proceedings.
Anyone considering arbitration as part of their dispute resolution process
should be aware that arbitration results in a final decision with very limited
grounds for review by a Court.
4. Court. A
legal action must be filed to obtain a divorce or legal separation. Most issues
related to separation and divorce are not resolved by a Judge because the
parties reach agreements prior to a court hearing. Spouses can reach agreements
between themselves or by using one of the dispute resolution models referenced
above. Judges enter agreements as final orders or decide issues and enter
orders based on evidence and arguments presented in Court when the parties
can’t resolve the issues themselves.
The above summaries are
brief outlines of four available dispute resolution options. See the More
Information Page for additional information regarding these models.
|